Practical Quality

via perszi

Practical quality – what is it, and why is it important?

It’s something I’ve been thinking about a lot lately. My theory is that there’s such a thing as “practical quality” when it comes to clothing/shoes. A better way to put it is the “quality plateau” – after a certain price point, the quality of the materials and construction doesn’t increase enough to warrant the corresponding price increase. More expensive doesn’t necessarily mean more durable. Example? Do you need the most expensive leather to make a quality pair of shoes? No. Chances are, the most expensive leather might be so soft and delicate you can rarely wear the shoes anyways!

So, what are you paying for when you buy, for another example, a really expensive pair of shoes? Let’s break it down, using Fluevog, which I consider a mid-priced line (in the big picture – I know they’re still very pricey to a lot of people), and Alexander McQueen. Not because I want to pick on poor McQueen – I salivate over his shows as much as anyone else! – just because he’s the first example to come to mind.

Design:

comparisonshoes

Fluevog ($359) on the left, McQueen ($874) on the right!

I’d say they’re very evenly tied regarding design, although obviously that’ll depend on personal taste. We all know what McQueen’s aesthetic tends toward: the macabre and avant-garde. To be fair, he has his share of rather dull shoes as well. Fluevog has some pretty dowdy shoes, and the heels they’re most famous for – the Minis – aren’t my favorites at all. But they’ve also got totally droolworthy shoes like the above shoes, Berlin Mittes, Coffee Arabicas, and everyone’s favorite – the LA Silverlakes (or her knee high sister, the LA Melrose).

Construction:

Fluevog: Fluevog shoes are handmade in small runs with high quality materials, at small factories that have great safety records. For the most part, the factories are in rural communities and are an important part of their economy. The workers are paid higher than minimum wage, get 1 1/2 hour lunch breaks, and have good benefits/insurance packages.

McQueen: The only information I can find anywhere is that they’re made in Italy. I’m going to assume, because of the price of the shoes, that they’re made by people being paid a decent wage, who get lunch breaks and all that nice jazz. But they might not be at all – check out this post at VueSociety about how some designers will have the uppers made in China & then have the soles put on in Italy, to justify the “Made in Italy” stamp. Most or all of his shoes have a leather sole. Leather soles seem to be a matter of some debate among shoe fanatics. I’ve heard leather soles are better because that means the shoe can be resoled (although, as far as I know, there’s nothing keeping other shoes from being resoled). I’ve also been told that leather soles are worse because they’re more vulnerable to the elements.

Comfort:

Fluevogs are known for their comfort, and I can personally attest to that. I’ve never worn more comfortable heels. I can’t seem to find any information about McQueen shoes and comfort; there are some pretty high heels, but most have platforms in the front, so maybe they’re not so bad.

Price Range:

(these are normal retail prices, sale items excluded)

Fluevog: $145 to $549 (for the Body Part boots – which are part of a special line that runs higher than normal). Most fall between $200-350.

McQueen: $489 (for a pair of basic flats) to around $1,200.

The verdict? As always, make your own decisions – but I don’t see enough difference in anything besides the marketing/branding to justify the price gap.

Am I suggesting that designers need to drop their prices? No. It would defeat the purpose of a luxury item and probably piss off their target market (because the people who are going to drop that much money on a pair of shoes specifically want something that most people can’t get; the money is used as a barrier). I’m saying that as a consumer, it’s a good idea to be aware of what exactly goes into $1,200 shoes and know that you’re paying as much for the label as anything else.

The best thing you can do to increase the quality of your wardrobe is take great care of what you have. Let your clothes air-dry if you can. Regularly condition, clean, and polish your shoes. A closet full of mid-range items that have been well taken care of should do you just fine!

A few closing notes so I don’t get an angry mob with torches & pitchforks coming after me:

  • Indie designers are exempt from most of this; it’s generally a lot harder for independent designers to have a decent profit margin and so their clothes might end up higher priced than mass-market clothing of similar quality. When I have the money, I much prefer to support smaller businesses & designers.
  • I’m not trying to make anyone feel guilty for buying expensive things. It’s your money and you should, of course, do whatever you damn well please with it.
  • And of course, if you want to buy something , consider it a work of art, and never wear it, then feel free to do so. I know many people would argue that I’m missing the point here, that designer clothes are art, etc. etc. My opinion? Clothes by their very nature were made to be worn, and to make unwearable (or nearly so) clothes or shoes in the name of art is pretty f’n pretentious. And by unwearable, I don’t mean “too loud” or any of that nonsense, I mean literally unwearable in normal day to day life, without breaking an ankle or something ripping.

12 Responses to “Practical Quality”

  • I’d also add, I can’t tell you the number of times I’ve heard or read stories about a woman buying a pair of designer shoes, Louboutins or Choos, wearing them out walking around for an afternoon (or on her way to work) only to have them destroyed within reason in an hour. Often times, designer shoes aren’t MADE to be practically worn.

    There’s a reason Carrie Bradshaw took cabs and was barefoot at home.
    .-= Ashe MIschief´s last blog ..Thanksgiving at the Races! =-.

  • Sheena says:

    I do believe that some get so caught up in the hype of a designer that they will wear the shoes no matter what. When you have a shoe designer like Fluevog, which isn’t necessarily inexpensive, but still well-made for the price, some may become turned off because he’s not as “well known”. It might not even matter if it is a beautifully constructed shoe, some still just want to pay for the name if they are going to be paying that much money, quality or not.
    .-= Sheena´s last blog ..Where are you hiding? =-.

  • Retro Chick says:

    I think definitely a massive part of the price tag is just the sense of exlusivity that comes with a designer label.

    I think when you’re talking couture clothing sometimes it’s different, a custom made dress with hundreds of hand sewn beads for instance might nearly justify a serveral thousand pound price tag. Bu most Ready to Wear collections are probably over priced I think!
    .-= Retro Chick´s last blog ..Where Do Your Outfits Start? =-.

  • Michelle says:

    Retro Chick – Oh yeah, I definitely think couture is a different level of what I was talking about. Something that’s handsewn takes AGES and so they have to cover the cost of their wages + the materials and all of that jazz. Although I still have my doubts as to how practical it would be, but you know.

    Thank you for your thoughts, Ashe & Sheena! Good input. :)

  • Alicia says:

    This is so on point. I can’t get how some people will thumb their nose at a lower priced garment made of the same damn materials. An A. Wang tank top is still a damn tank top.

    A lot of times you are paying for a name. Price doesn’t always reflect quality.

  • M says:

    good post so glad you mentioned the difference as far as startup designers that have more difficulty with their labels, due to their size prices go up which they can’t really help also Alicia mentions that an A.Wang tank is still a tank which is true however the difference is in the details perhaps french seams or the fit of said tank is way different from a similarly sourced design at half the price plus the really luxe items justify their prices by way of quality that will last you a lifetime like Hermes -they have lifelong guarantee as I understand, so whatever goes wrong they fix it for you for free- not sure the same goes for big hipe brands as J.Choo or McQueen
    .-= M´s last blog ..DIY Fendi =-.

  • Kristen says:

    I really feel that although there is definitly something to paying more for quality, but that is usually the difference between low-price and mid-price when you get into the really high price range, in most cases you are definitly paying for the highly sought after name on the label.
    .-= Kristen´s last blog ..Fashion Dare: Wham Glam Thank-You Ma’am =-.

Leave a Reply

 

connect
twitterRSSemail

join the mailing list & receive emails when Wicked Whimsy is updated:
* indicates required
find what you’re looking for
archives