Labels Are Only Good On Wine

via

When do labels stop serving us?

I’m thinking in particular of “right brain” vs. “left brain”. I don’t feel like “right brained” is a good label for me, at all, although I suppose it sort of fits on the surface. I’m something of both worlds when it comes to the right vs. left brain issue. Intuitive yet analytical, creative and also organized as hell. About the only trait I have that sits firmly in the stereotypical right brained camp is that I’m an intensely visual person (no surprise with my love of aesthetics & style, right?). I learn much faster if I can see something laid out before me, and if possible, actually touch and play with it and all of the parts, than by attempting to read a manual.

Aside from all of this, and the fact that I know others who are much more of “whole minds” than “left brainers” or “right brainers”, the whole right vs. left brain issue has come under scientific scrutiny:

An article was published this week in the venerable (and reliable) psychology journal Psychological Bulletin, which synthesized 67 brain imaging studies of creativity. Among other things, it showed that creativity is not especially a right-brain function. In fact, two of three broad classes of creative thought that have been studied seem not to depend on a single set of brain structures.

What we call “creativity” is so diverse that it can’t be localized in the brain very well.

(via)

I have to wonder if some people aren’t boxing themselves in with these labels, unintentionally or not. I hear creatives proudly crow that they are disorganized, that they thrive in chaos, that they don’t need no stinkin’ organization! And maybe this is true for some – I’m not accusing anyone of having flaming pants, here. But I wonder if it’s true for everyone. Me personally, my creativity thrives in an organized environment, and I know I’m not the only one. When I’m disorganized, I lose ideas, I lose inspiration, I feel like a mess. Point being: maybe some people are shooting themselves in the foot with preconceived notions of what does & doesn’t work well with creativity, and the labels that go with them.

Labels are easy, quick, convenient; they afford us a way to sum everything up in a word or two. Who doesn’t like the ease of that? And almost every label can be twisted to be used as an excuse – someone could call themselves a Scanner or Renaissance person (one of my own labels, thanks very much!) when they’re really just a flake with no follow through. They can be used with a sort of cutting self-deprecation to keep us from living up to our potential; “Oh,” you say with a little laugh, “I’ll never be good at math, I’m just too right-brained for that!”

Labels are much like stories in that they should be regularly scrutinized to see how true they actually are and if they’re serving us or if we’re serving them. And if you do realize that you’re serving it instead of vice versa, it can be incredibly hard to shed that label – we attach so much to them. But in the long run, it’s worth it, because the wrong label (even if it’s only something you say in your head & not out loud – especially so, in that case) will weigh you down faster than a pair of concrete shoes.

Psst, go check out my guest post today at Kind Over Matter – and leave a comment to enter to win a copy of Take Back Your Creativity!

  • http://www.wingnetmarketing.com Karim

    Michelle!

    I love so much your secound guessing, not long ago I used the term “re-questionning” but I’m looking for another word, to express the idea of re-asking a question about a problem and suggesting that the already known solution maybe completely uncomplete or even false. The elements that we may use to conduct our thinking should be re-questionned as well, and I think this can’t be possible without practicing analysis+synthesis.
    I am far from being perfect at it, but discovered long ago that I was an ‘Analyst,’ before reading anything about creativity or any book whatsover, and before even knowing how to use Internet, so I think I am safe from any directed auto-labelisation.

    I enjoy your thinking very much, keep up the magnificent work!!! (Yes, Three Exclamation Points :p)

    K’

  • Anonymous

    I’ve been rejecting labels consciously and unconsciously for most of my life. But honestly, I don’t think about them that much because my brain isn’t programmed to assign qualities or goodness/badness to those labels (especially in other people). I realize that makes me a bit of a freak, and no one actually believes me when I say it, but it’s true. It’s nice and frustrating at the same time…

  • http://twitter.com/lojinks Lorraine Williams

    I’m so with you on thisMichelle. when we label ourselves or others we are resignedly denying possiblities – I am creative and logical, I love to be spontaneous and I get a kick out of planning stuff and being organised too. the only label I’ll own up to is being an extraordinary human being, and so is everyone else on this extraordinary planet we’re privileged enough to live on. I can’t stand lazy labelling and closed thinking! It’s so last century!

  • http://www.wicked-whimsy.com Michelle

    Thanks for your comment Lorraine – glad you liked the post! “Extraordinary human being” is definitely a label I can get behind :D

  • http://www.wicked-whimsy.com Michelle

    Why thank you, Karim! Three exclamation points is indeed quite the compliment ;) Constant questioning and analysis will definitely take you far when it comes to self improvement!

  • http://www.wicked-whimsy.com Michelle

    I can imagine it’d be frustrating, since if you don’t assign qualities to a label, it’s just kind of a meaningless word ;) I don’t think most labels are inherently good or bad, but I do think people have a tendency to use them as a sort of shield or built-in excuse sometimes.

  • Kballor

    Enjoyed your post! I think labels are like self fulfilling prophesy if you take them too seriously. And especially on this topic of right and left brain thinking…it seems to me that right and left brain are on a scale and depending where you are in life, the needle swings. Jobs, projects, interests, and probably lots more things affect how we think and solve problems. Everyone has at least some right and some left.

  • http://www.wicked-whimsy.com Michelle

    Thanks for your comment – glad you liked the post!

    I definitely think left vs right brain is more of a continuum (or hell, a spiderweb of connections) than an either-or sort of thing. And I’ve seen people get so attached to a label that they’ll do unreasonable things to try and stay within the confines of that label – honestly, I’ve done that myself once or twice!

  • http://www.wicked-whimsy.com Michelle

    Thanks for your comment – glad you liked the post!

    I definitely think left vs right brain is more of a continuum (or hell, a spiderweb of connections) than an either-or sort of thing. And I’ve seen people get so attached to a label that they’ll do unreasonable things to try and stay within the confines of that label – honestly, I’ve done that myself once or twice!

  • http://touchofbedlam.tumblr.com Lem

    i feel like labels in general should be considered “starting points” or “introductions” instead of the end-all and be-all. which unfortunately seems to be how most people use them.

  • http://www.wicked-whimsy.com Michelle

    Definitely agree. Labels are convenient shorthand for a much longer explanation, so we can’t (and shouldn’t) get rid of them entirely; but when someone sticks with a rigid definition & doesn’t view the label with any subtlety or depth, that’s when it gets to be a problem.